BOOT vs. URBN
BOOT (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.) and URBN (Urban Outfitters, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Apparel Retail industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, BOOT returned 35.85%/yr vs 9.50%/yr for URBN. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOOT vs. URBN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly higher than URBN's -3.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOT has outperformed URBN with an annualized return of 35.85%, while URBN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.50% annualized return.
BOOT
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -11.42%
- 1Y
- 9.13%
- 3Y*
- 36.12%
- 5Y*
- 17.85%
- 10Y*
- 35.85%
URBN
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- -3.99%
- 6M
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- -0.50%
- 3Y*
- 31.70%
- 5Y*
- 14.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
BOOT vs. URBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | -2.60% | 16.24% | 97.79% | 22.78% | -49.19% | 183.79% | -2.63% | 161.48% | 2.53% | 32.67% |
URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. | -3.99% | 37.14% | 53.77% | 49.64% | -18.77% | 14.69% | -7.81% | -16.36% | -5.31% | 23.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOOT and URBN is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014 | 0.47 |
The correlation between BOOT and URBN shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BOOT:
$5.28B
URBN:
$6.42B
BOOT:
$7.35
URBN:
$5.18
BOOT:
23.39
URBN:
13.94
BOOT:
4.78
URBN:
0.59
BOOT:
2.34
URBN:
1.04
BOOT:
4.00
URBN:
2.46
BOOT:
$2.25B
URBN:
$6.32B
BOOT:
$858.36M
URBN:
$2.27B
BOOT:
$358.43M
URBN:
$603.32M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOOT vs. URBN — Risk / Return Rank
BOOT
URBN
BOOT vs. URBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOOT | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | -0.01 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | 0.30 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.04 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 0.13 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.54 | 0.25 | +0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOOT | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | -0.01 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.30 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.20 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.20 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
BOOT vs. URBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, roughly equal to the maximum URBN drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and URBN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOOT | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.73% | -83.96% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.01% | -26.32% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.93% | -28.53% | -20.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.62% | -56.36% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.88% | -73.80% | -4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.35% | -12.62% | -4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.35% | -32.58% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.50% | 13.67% | -0.17% |
Volatility
BOOT vs. URBN - Volatility Comparison
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 15.90% compared to Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) at 10.52%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOOT | URBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.90% | 10.52% | +5.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.56% | 28.85% | +3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.85% | 43.23% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.78% | 47.23% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.04% | 48.76% | +8.28% |
Dividends
BOOT vs. URBN - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOOT nor URBN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BOOT vs. URBN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Urban Outfitters, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BOOT vs. URBN - Profitability Comparison
BOOT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 195.75M and revenue of 538.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
URBN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a gross profit of 542.57M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.
BOOT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.22M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
URBN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported an operating income of 139.68M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
BOOT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 44.44M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
URBN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a net income of 115.71M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOOT and URBN have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOOT has higher volatility (15.90%) compared to URBN (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOOT dropped -83.73% vs URBN's -83.96%.
BOOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOOT and URBN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer