BOOT vs. URBN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN).

Performance

BOOT vs. URBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOOT vs. URBN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.	-17.06%	16.24%	97.79%	22.78%	-49.19%	183.79%	-2.63%	161.48%	2.53%	32.67%
URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc.	-15.83%	37.14%	53.77%	49.64%	-18.77%	14.69%	-7.81%	-16.36%	-5.31%	23.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BOOT : $4.50B URBN : $5.79B
EPS BOOT : $7.12 URBN : $5.04
PE Ratio BOOT : 20.55 URBN : 12.57
PEG Ratio BOOT : 0.39 URBN : 0.54
PS Ratio BOOT : 2.07 URBN : 0.95
PB Ratio BOOT : 3.50 URBN : 2.06
Total Revenue (TTM) BOOT : $2.17B URBN : $6.17B
Gross Profit (TTM) BOOT : $831.18M URBN : $2.22B
EBITDA (TTM) BOOT : $347.67M URBN : $622.65M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -17.06% return, which is significantly lower than URBN's -15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOT has outperformed URBN with an annualized return of 31.25%, while URBN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.33% annualized return.

BOOT

• 1D: 4.59%
• 1M: -22.65%
• YTD: -17.06%
• 6M: -11.68%
• 1Y: 36.24%
• 3Y*: 24.07%
• 5Y*: 18.82%
• 10Y*: 31.25%

URBN

• 1D: 3.97%
• 1M: -4.31%
• YTD: -15.83%
• 6M: -11.31%
• 1Y: 20.90%
• 3Y*: 31.72%
• 5Y*: 11.77%
• 10Y*: 6.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BOOT vs. URBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOOT

BOOT Risk / Return Rank: 67
BOOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BOOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BOOT Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BOOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BOOT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

URBN

URBN Risk / Return Rank: 58
URBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
URBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
URBN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
URBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
URBN Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOOT vs. URBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOOT	URBN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.38	+0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	0.98	+0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.13	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	0.88	+0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.03	1.80	+2.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOOT vs. URBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the URBN Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and URBN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOOT	URBN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.38	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.25	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.13	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.19	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between BOOT and URBN is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BOOT vs. URBN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOOT nor URBN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BOOT vs. URBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, roughly equal to the maximum URBN drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and URBN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOOT	URBN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.73%	-83.96%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.71%	-26.32%	-6.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.62%	-56.36%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.88%	-73.80%	-4.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.63%	-23.40%	-6.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.48%	-32.67%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.05%	12.77%	-2.72%

Volatility

BOOT vs. URBN - Volatility Comparison

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) at 8.61%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOOT	URBN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.00%	8.61%	+3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.98%	31.79%	-1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.59%	55.85%	-5.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.75%	47.73%	+2.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.78%	48.89%	+8.89%

Financials

BOOT vs. URBN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Urban Outfitters, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BOOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 281.24M and revenue of 705.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

URBN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a gross profit of 599.20M and revenue of 1.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

BOOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.78M and revenue of 705.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

URBN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported an operating income of 156.71M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

BOOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.81M and revenue of 705.64M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

URBN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a net income of 96.27M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.