BLGR vs. LRNZ

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

BLGR (Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLGR charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.

Performance

BLGR vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLGR

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.53%
• 6M: 9.99%
• YTD: 9.83%
• 1Y: 21.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRNZ

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLGR vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	0.57%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	-1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BLGR and LRNZ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	0.80

BLGR vs. LRNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLGR	LRNZ
Technology	49.0%	82.1%
Communication Services	15.6%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	-
Financial Services	7.7%	-
Healthcare	6.9%	15.0%
Industrials	6.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	-
Basic Materials	0.7%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Utilities	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

BLGR vs. LRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLGR

BLGR Risk / Return Rank: 42
BLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
BLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
BLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 42

LRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLGR vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLGR	LRNZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.53	—	—

Drawdowns

BLGR vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLGR drawdown since its inception was -14.08%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -3.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLGR and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLGR	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.08%	-3.01%	-11.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-1.80%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.56%	-1.50%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLGR	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.21%	34.25%	-18.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	34.25%	-18.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.97%	34.25%	-18.28%

BLGR vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLGR has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLGR vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

BLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	0.32%	0.17%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLGR and LRNZ in my portfolio?

BLGR and LRNZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLGR or LRNZ?

On fees, BLGR is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLGR or LRNZ?

BLGR is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLGR or LRNZ?

BLGR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between BLGR and LRNZ?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BLGR and 0.68% for LRNZ.