PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLGR vs. BLUC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLGR vs. BLUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BLGR having a 10.51% return and BLUC slightly lower at 10.25%.


BLGR

1D
-0.96%
1M
6.35%
YTD
10.51%
6M
10.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLUC

1D
-1.43%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLGR vs. BLUC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLGR
Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF
10.51%16.11%
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
10.25%14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BLGR and BLUC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.97

BLGR vs. BLUC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLGR
BLUC

Technology

48.1%
40.6%

Communication Services

15.8%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.7%

Financial Services

8.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

6.7%
7.7%

Industrials

6.1%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
4.0%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.5%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.6%

Energy

0.6%
2.7%

Utilities

0.6%
1.7%

Technology

BLGR
48.1%
BLUC
40.6%

Communication Services

BLGR
15.8%
BLUC
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BLGR
10.7%
BLUC
10.7%

Financial Services

BLGR
8.2%
BLUC
9.8%

Healthcare

BLGR
6.7%
BLUC
7.7%

Industrials

BLGR
6.1%
BLUC
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

BLGR
1.8%
BLUC
4.0%

Basic Materials

BLGR
0.8%
BLUC
1.5%

Real Estate

BLGR
0.7%
BLUC
1.6%

Energy

BLGR
0.6%
BLUC
2.7%

Utilities

BLGR
0.6%
BLUC
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLGR vs. BLUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLGR vs. BLUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLGRBLUCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.96

2.11

-0.15

Drawdowns

BLGR vs. BLUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLGR drawdown since its inception was -14.08%, which is greater than BLUC's maximum drawdown of -10.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLGR and BLUC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLGRBLUCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.08%

-10.69%

-3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.43%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-1.52%

-0.91%

Volatility

BLGR vs. BLUC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLGRBLUCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

13.00%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

13.00%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

13.00%

+2.41%

BLGR vs. BLUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLGR has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUC's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLGR vs. BLUC - Dividend Comparison

BLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than BLUC's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BLGR
Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF
0.23%0.17%
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
0.51%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BLGR and BLUC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BLGR.

BLUC has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.23% for BLGR.

BLGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BLUC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BLGR and 0.23% for BLUC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLGR and BLUC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer