BLGR vs. BVAL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BLGR (Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF) and BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while BVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bluemonte. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLGR returned 20.70% vs 25.50% for BVAL. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.24% expense ratio.

Performance

BLGR vs. BVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLGR achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly lower than BVAL's 14.62% return.

BLGR

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 1.74%
• 6M: 9.48%
• YTD: 9.42%
• 1Y: 20.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.50%

BVAL

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 1.22%
• 6M: 10.01%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 1Y: 25.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	$558.89K	$567.38K	$1.01M
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	$658.39K	$641.04K	$1.02M

BLGR vs. BVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	9.42%	16.59%
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	14.62%	12.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BLGR and BVAL is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.63

The correlation between BLGR and BVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLGR vs. BVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLGR	BVAL
Technology	48.8%	23.6%
Communication Services	14.3%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	8.5%
Financial Services	8.3%	16.3%
Healthcare	7.6%	11.2%
Industrials	6.7%	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	7.6%
Basic Materials	0.8%	2.9%
Real Estate	0.7%	3.5%
Utilities	0.6%	4.0%
Energy	0.5%	5.8%

Return for Risk

BLGR vs. BVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLGR

BLGR Risk / Return Rank: 43
BLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
BLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
BLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 43

BVAL

BVAL Risk / Return Rank: 90
BVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
BVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLGR vs. BVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLGR	BVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	2.48	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	3.46	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.45	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	3.83	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.12	16.14	-11.02

BLGR vs. BVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLGR Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the BVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLGR and BVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLGR vs. BVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLGR drawdown since its inception was -14.08%, which is greater than BVAL's maximum drawdown of -6.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLGR and BVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLGR	BVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.08%	-6.69%	-7.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	-6.69%	-7.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	0.00%	-2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.66%	-0.86%	-1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	1.58%	+2.48%

Volatility

BLGR vs. BVAL - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) at 2.59%. This indicates that BLGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLGR	BVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	2.59%	+2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	7.90%	+5.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.78%	10.33%	+6.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	10.18%	+6.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	10.18%	+6.06%

BLGR vs. BVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLGR and BVAL have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BLGR vs. BVAL - Dividend Comparison

BLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than BVAL's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	0.32%	0.17%
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	1.30%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLGR and BVAL in my portfolio?

BLGR and BVAL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLGR or BVAL?

BLGR has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to BVAL (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLGR dropped -14.08% vs BVAL's -6.69%.

Which ETF is better, BLGR or BVAL?

On 1-year performance, BVAL leads with 25.50% vs 20.70% for BLGR. Both ETFs have the same 0.24% expense ratio. On volatility, BVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLGR or BVAL?

Over the 1-year period, BVAL has performed better with a 25.50% return vs 20.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLGR or BVAL?

BLGR and BVAL have the same expense ratio: 0.24% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLGR or BVAL?

BVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.32% for BLGR.

What is the main difference between BLGR and BVAL?

BLGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BVAL is Large Cap Value Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.