BKLC vs. PBUS
BKLC (BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - BKLC tracks the Morningstar US Large Cap Index while PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKLC returned 14.33%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for PBUS. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BKLC charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.
Performance
BKLC vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BKLC having a 10.93% return and PBUS slightly lower at 10.82%.
BKLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 6M
- 10.81%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 23.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
BKLC vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 10.93% | 18.06% | 25.56% | 30.88% | -20.52% | 27.41% | 37.38% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 39.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKLC and PBUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between BKLC and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
BKLC vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKLC
PBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BKLC
PBUS
Financial Services
BKLC
PBUS
Communication Services
BKLC
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
BKLC
PBUS
Healthcare
BKLC
PBUS
Industrials
BKLC
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
BKLC
PBUS
Energy
BKLC
PBUS
Utilities
BKLC
PBUS
Real Estate
BKLC
PBUS
Basic Materials
BKLC
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKLC vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
BKLC
PBUS
BKLC vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKLC | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 3.08 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 13.93 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKLC | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.30 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.80 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.80 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
BKLC vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKLC | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.14% | -33.15% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -9.02% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -19.07% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | -25.40% | -0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.64% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -5.13% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.99% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BKLC vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) have volatilities of 3.00% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKLC | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 2.94% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 9.13% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 12.06% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 17.05% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 19.33% | -1.89% |
BKLC vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BKLC vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, BKLC and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BKLC has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLC dropped -26.14% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 5-year performance, BKLC leads with 14.33% vs 13.48% for PBUS. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for PBUS.
BKLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.98% for PBUS.
BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BKLC and 0.04% for PBUS.
BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKLC and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer