BKLC vs. SPTM
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM).
BKLC and SPTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKLC is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2020. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. Both BKLC and SPTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKLC or SPTM.
Performance
BKLC vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a 26.18% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's 24.69% return.
BKLC
26.18%
1.69%
12.80%
32.99%
N/A
N/A
SPTM
24.69%
1.31%
12.03%
31.89%
15.27%
12.87%
Key characteristics
| BKLC | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.68 | 2.59 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.61 | 3.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.49 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.91 | 3.78 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.62 | 16.64 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.87% | 1.90% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.26% | 12.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.14% | -54.80% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.26% | -1.53% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKLC vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between BKLC and SPTM is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKLC vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKLC vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than SPTM's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.24% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.71% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
BKLC vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and SPTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKLC vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.