BKLC vs. CNRG
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG).
BKLC and CNRG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKLC is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2020. CNRG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. Both BKLC and CNRG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKLC or CNRG.
Correlation
The correlation between BKLC and CNRG is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BKLC vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BKLC:
0.55
CNRG:
-0.37
BKLC:
0.89
CNRG:
-0.31
BKLC:
1.13
CNRG:
0.97
BKLC:
0.57
CNRG:
-0.18
BKLC:
2.31
CNRG:
-1.01
BKLC:
4.68%
CNRG:
12.44%
BKLC:
19.55%
CNRG:
34.62%
BKLC:
-26.14%
CNRG:
-68.49%
BKLC:
-10.17%
CNRG:
-63.80%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a -5.89% return, which is significantly higher than CNRG's -16.37% return.
BKLC
-5.89%
-3.22%
-4.09%
11.23%
16.08%
N/A
CNRG
-16.37%
-3.54%
-17.64%
-11.78%
5.42%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKLC vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKLC vs. CNRG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BKLC
CNRG
BKLC vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKLC vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison
BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than CNRG's 1.46% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.30% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 1.46% | 1.34% | 1.17% | 1.23% | 1.34% | 0.69% | 1.16% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
BKLC vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum CNRG drawdown of -68.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and CNRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKLC vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) is 14.26%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a volatility of 17.10%. This indicates that BKLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.