BKLC vs. FNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX).
BKLC and FNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKLC is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2020. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both BKLC and FNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKLC or FNDX.
Correlation
The correlation between BKLC and FNDX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BKLC vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BKLC:
2.26
FNDX:
1.90
BKLC:
3.01
FNDX:
2.63
BKLC:
1.41
FNDX:
1.35
BKLC:
3.38
FNDX:
3.29
BKLC:
14.95
FNDX:
11.53
BKLC:
1.90%
FNDX:
1.84%
BKLC:
12.62%
FNDX:
11.22%
BKLC:
-26.14%
FNDX:
-37.71%
BKLC:
-2.75%
FNDX:
-5.05%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a 26.58% return, which is significantly higher than FNDX's 19.17% return.
BKLC
26.58%
0.32%
9.85%
27.26%
N/A
N/A
FNDX
19.17%
-2.37%
8.53%
20.12%
16.37%
14.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKLC vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKLC vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKLC vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than FNDX's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.76% | 2.66% | 4.03% | 2.37% | 3.34% | 4.27% | 6.16% | 3.94% | 4.97% | 5.22% | 3.20% | 0.46% |
Drawdowns
BKLC vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and FNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKLC vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.58%. This indicates that BKLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.