PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BKLC vs. FHLC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BKLC and FHLC is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

BKLC vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.18%
-4.51%
BKLC
FHLC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BKLC:

2.24

FHLC:

0.25

Sortino Ratio

BKLC:

2.97

FHLC:

0.41

Omega Ratio

BKLC:

1.41

FHLC:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

BKLC:

3.45

FHLC:

0.23

Martin Ratio

BKLC:

14.27

FHLC:

0.63

Ulcer Index

BKLC:

2.03%

FHLC:

4.41%

Daily Std Dev

BKLC:

12.97%

FHLC:

11.39%

Max Drawdown

BKLC:

-26.14%

FHLC:

-28.76%

Current Drawdown

BKLC:

-1.53%

FHLC:

-9.53%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BKLC having a 2.07% return and FHLC slightly lower at 2.00%.


BKLC

YTD

2.07%

1M

1.25%

6M

9.18%

1Y

26.40%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FHLC

YTD

2.00%

1M

1.91%

6M

-4.52%

1Y

2.79%

5Y*

7.02%

10Y*

8.60%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKLC vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for FHLC: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%
Expense ratio chart for BKLC: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BKLC vs. FHLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BKLC is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BKLC is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BKLC is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BKLC is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BKLC is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BKLC is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FHLC is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BKLC vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BKLC, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.240.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for BKLC, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.970.41
The chart of Omega ratio for BKLC, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.411.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for BKLC, currently valued at 3.45, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.450.23
The chart of Martin ratio for BKLC, currently valued at 14.27, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.270.63
BKLC
FHLC

The current BKLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLC and FHLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.24
0.25
BKLC
FHLC

Dividends

BKLC vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than FHLC's 1.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.20%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
1.48%1.51%1.40%1.30%1.16%1.45%1.18%2.14%1.38%1.40%2.07%1.03%

Drawdowns

BKLC vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum FHLC drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and FHLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.53%
-9.53%
BKLC
FHLC

Volatility

BKLC vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 3.82%. This indicates that BKLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.16%
3.82%
BKLC
FHLC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab