BKEM vs. PIE
BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index, while PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKEM returned 6.67%/yr vs 5.47%/yr for PIE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKEM charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PIE.
Performance
BKEM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKEM achieves a 22.14% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 36.00% return.
BKEM
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 16.09%
- YTD
- 22.14%
- 1Y
- 38.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- —
PIE
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 28.78%
- YTD
- 36.00%
- 1Y
- 56.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
BKEM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 22.14% | 30.55% | 7.53% | 8.68% | -19.43% | -3.91% | 48.44% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 36.00% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 49.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKEM and PIE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.79 |
The correlation between BKEM and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
BKEM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKEM
PIE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
BKEM
PIE
Financial Services
BKEM
PIE
Consumer Cyclical
BKEM
PIE
Industrials
BKEM
PIE
Communication Services
BKEM
PIE
Basic Materials
BKEM
PIE
Energy
BKEM
PIE
Healthcare
BKEM
PIE
Consumer Defensive
BKEM
PIE
Utilities
BKEM
PIE
Real Estate
BKEM
PIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKEM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank
BKEM
PIE
BKEM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 5.71 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 16.45 | -6.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKEM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKEM and PIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.48% | -72.98% | +33.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -9.87% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | -28.69% | +10.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -40.06% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.51% | -6.96% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -25.95% | +10.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 3.42% | +0.44% |
Volatility
BKEM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) is 10.25%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that BKEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 11.39% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.99% | 22.07% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.93% | 25.16% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 21.04% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 21.64% | -1.99% |
BKEM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKEM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison
BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than PIE's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.92% | 2.25% | 2.76% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.78% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKEM and PIE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to BKEM (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKEM dropped -39.48% vs PIE's -72.98%.
On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 6.67% vs 5.47% for PIE. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BKEM has been the lower-risk option at 10.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 6.67% return vs 5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
BKEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.78% for PIE.
BKEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BKEM and 0.90% for PIE.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKEM and PIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer