PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKEM vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKEM vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKEM achieves a 24.97% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 8.20% return.


BKEM

1D
-5.37%
1M
2.20%
YTD
24.97%
6M
25.93%
1Y
47.05%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

BKIE

1D
-1.71%
1M
0.06%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.80%
1Y
22.90%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKEM vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
24.97%30.55%7.53%8.68%-19.43%-3.91%48.44%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
8.20%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BKEM and BKIE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.75

The correlation between BKEM and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKEM vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKEM
BKIE

Technology

43.0%
10.9%

Financial Services

16.9%
25.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
7.4%

Industrials

8.1%
18.2%

Communication Services

5.8%
4.4%

Basic Materials

5.7%
7.3%

Energy

3.4%
5.5%

Healthcare

2.7%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
6.2%

Utilities

2.0%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.9%

Technology

BKEM
43.0%
BKIE
10.9%

Financial Services

BKEM
16.9%
BKIE
25.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BKEM
8.7%
BKIE
7.4%

Industrials

BKEM
8.1%
BKIE
18.2%

Communication Services

BKEM
5.8%
BKIE
4.4%

Basic Materials

BKEM
5.7%
BKIE
7.3%

Energy

BKEM
3.4%
BKIE
5.5%

Healthcare

BKEM
2.7%
BKIE
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

BKEM
2.6%
BKIE
6.2%

Utilities

BKEM
2.0%
BKIE
3.5%

Real Estate

BKEM
1.1%
BKIE
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKEM vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKEM vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKEMBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.27

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

2.02

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

7.76

+5.42

BKEM vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKEM and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKEM vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKEM and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKEMBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-28.19%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-11.41%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-13.19%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.20%

-28.19%

-8.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-1.87%

-3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-4.94%

-10.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

2.96%

+0.62%

Volatility

BKEM vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a higher volatility of 12.30% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.96%. This indicates that BKEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKEMBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.30%

4.96%

+7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.07%

12.84%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.13%

15.14%

+6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

16.21%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

16.37%

+3.18%

BKEM vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKEM vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than BKIE's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.51%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.27%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKEM and BKIE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKEM has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to BKIE (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKEM dropped -39.48% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.19% vs 6.77% for BKEM. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for BKEM.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.51% for BKEM.

BKEM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BKIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BKEM and 0.04% for BKIE.

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKEM and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer