PortfoliosLab logo


Last updated May 27, 2023

Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM).

BKEM and SPEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKEM is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2020. SPEM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets BMI. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. Both BKEM and SPEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKEM or SPEM.

Key characteristics

YTD Return2.61%2.67%
1Y Return-3.87%-1.93%
5Y Return (Ann)5.27%0.70%
10Y Return (Ann)5.27%2.56%
Sharpe Ratio-0.13-0.02
Daily Std Dev19.53%17.89%
Max Drawdown-39.48%-64.41%



The correlation between BKEM and SPEM is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

BKEM vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BKEM having a 2.61% return and SPEM slightly higher at 2.67%. Over the past 10 years, BKEM has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 5.27%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.56% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

BKEM vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than SPEM's 3.29% yield.

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

BKEM vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BKEM and SPEM have an expense ratio of 0.11%.

BKEM vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioUlcer Index
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

BKEM vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKEM Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BKEM and SPEM.


BKEM vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKEM drawdown for the period was -33.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SPEM drawdown of -27.58%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for BKEM and SPEM


BKEM vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 3.86%. This indicates that BKEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.