BKEM vs. IEMS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L).
BKEM and IEMS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKEM is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2020. IEMS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap. It was launched on Mar 6, 2009. Both BKEM and IEMS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKEM or IEMS.L.
Performance
BKEM vs. IEMS.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKEM achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than IEMS.L's 2.00% return.
BKEM
9.18%
-5.10%
0.61%
14.04%
N/A
N/A
IEMS.L
2.00%
-6.64%
-4.67%
8.20%
8.58%
4.69%
Key characteristics
| BKEM | IEMS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.93 | 0.52 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.37 | 0.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.10 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.47 | 0.75 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.56 | 2.64 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.08% | 2.67% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.18% | 13.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.48% | -49.93% |
| Current Drawdown | -18.73% | -8.68% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKEM vs. IEMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMS.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between BKEM and IEMS.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKEM vs. IEMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKEM vs. IEMS.L - Dividend Comparison
BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than IEMS.L's 1.82% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.59% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEMS.L iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF | 1.82% | 2.09% | 2.47% | 1.29% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 2.08% | 0.87% | 1.65% | 1.67% |
Drawdowns
BKEM vs. IEMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, smaller than the maximum IEMS.L drawdown of -49.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKEM and IEMS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKEM vs. IEMS.L - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) at 3.46%. This indicates that BKEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.