PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKEM vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKEM vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKEM achieves a 24.97% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 10.55% return.


BKEM

1D
-5.37%
1M
2.20%
YTD
24.97%
6M
25.93%
1Y
47.05%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

VWO

1D
-3.07%
1M
0.76%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.67%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKEM vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
24.97%30.55%7.53%8.68%-19.43%-3.91%48.44%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
10.55%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%45.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BKEM and VWO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.97

The correlation between BKEM and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKEM vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKEM
VWO

Technology

43.0%
31.6%

Financial Services

16.9%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
8.7%

Industrials

8.1%
6.8%

Communication Services

5.8%
5.8%

Basic Materials

5.7%
7.0%

Energy

3.4%
3.6%

Healthcare

2.7%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.1%

Utilities

2.0%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Technology

BKEM
43.0%
VWO
31.6%

Financial Services

BKEM
16.9%
VWO
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BKEM
8.7%
VWO
8.7%

Industrials

BKEM
8.1%
VWO
6.8%

Communication Services

BKEM
5.8%
VWO
5.8%

Basic Materials

BKEM
5.7%
VWO
7.0%

Energy

BKEM
3.4%
VWO
3.6%

Healthcare

BKEM
2.7%
VWO
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

BKEM
2.6%
VWO
3.1%

Utilities

BKEM
2.0%
VWO
2.4%

Real Estate

BKEM
1.1%
VWO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKEM vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKEM vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKEMVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

2.43

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

8.56

+4.62

BKEM vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKEM and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKEM vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKEM and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKEMVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-67.68%

+28.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-11.17%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-17.37%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.20%

-32.60%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-3.07%

-2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-15.79%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.17%

+0.41%

Volatility

BKEM vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a higher volatility of 12.30% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 7.37%. This indicates that BKEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKEMVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.30%

7.37%

+4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.07%

14.62%

+5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.13%

16.94%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

17.58%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

19.18%

+0.37%

BKEM vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKEM vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than VWO's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.51%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.33%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BKEM and VWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKEM has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to VWO (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKEM dropped -39.48% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 6.77% vs 5.09% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 6.77% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for BKEM.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.51% for BKEM.

BKEM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BKEM and 0.08% for VWO.

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKEM and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer