PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINT vs. GXTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINT vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly lower than GXTG's 23.43% return.


BINT

1D
0.01%
1M
4.42%
YTD
15.75%
6M
17.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXTG

1D
-1.42%
1M
4.46%
YTD
23.43%
6M
17.77%
1Y
19.75%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
-8.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINT vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BINT
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF
15.75%13.85%
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
23.43%-2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and GXTG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.79

BINT vs. GXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BINT
GXTG

Technology

24.4%
22.3%

Financial Services

18.8%
2.3%

Industrials

13.7%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
11.5%

Healthcare

7.5%
10.5%

Communication Services

6.4%
11.7%

Basic Materials

5.7%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.6%

-

Utilities

2.8%
12.4%

Real Estate

2.2%
6.9%

Technology

BINT
24.4%
GXTG
22.3%

Financial Services

BINT
18.8%
GXTG
2.3%

Industrials

BINT
13.7%
GXTG
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BINT
8.9%
GXTG
11.5%

Healthcare

BINT
7.5%
GXTG
10.5%

Communication Services

BINT
6.4%
GXTG
11.7%

Basic Materials

BINT
5.7%
GXTG
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

BINT
5.0%
GXTG

-

Energy

BINT
4.6%
GXTG

-

Utilities

BINT
2.8%
GXTG
12.4%

Real Estate

BINT
2.2%
GXTG
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINT vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINT

GXTG
GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINT vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BINT vs. GXTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BINTGXTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.31

0.11

+2.20

Drawdowns

BINT vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and GXTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINTGXTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-67.81%

+56.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-51.21%

+50.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-43.09%

+41.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.36%

Volatility

BINT vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINTGXTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

25.56%

-10.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

27.63%

-12.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.66%

29.59%

-14.93%

BINT vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BINT vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than GXTG's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BINT
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF
0.99%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
1.14%1.40%1.08%1.99%1.48%1.56%0.48%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


BINT and GXTG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.

GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.99% for BINT.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.50% for GXTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINT and GXTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer