BINT vs. GXTG
BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.
Performance
BINT vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly lower than GXTG's 23.43% return.
BINT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXTG
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 23.43%
- 6M
- 17.77%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- -8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
BINT vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF | 15.75% | 13.85% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 23.43% | -2.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINT and GXTG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.79 |
BINT vs. GXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BINT
GXTG
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
BINT
GXTG
Financial Services
BINT
GXTG
Industrials
BINT
GXTG
Consumer Cyclical
BINT
GXTG
Healthcare
BINT
GXTG
Communication Services
BINT
GXTG
Basic Materials
BINT
GXTG
Consumer Defensive
BINT
GXTG
-
Energy
BINT
GXTG
-
Utilities
BINT
GXTG
Real Estate
BINT
GXTG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BINT vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank
BINT
GXTG
BINT vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BINT | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.31 | 0.11 | +2.20 |
Drawdowns
BINT vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and GXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINT | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.94% | -67.81% | +56.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -51.21% | +50.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -43.09% | +41.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.36% | — |
Volatility
BINT vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BINT | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 25.56% | -10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 27.63% | -12.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 29.59% | -14.93% |
BINT vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BINT vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison
BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than GXTG's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.14% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BINT and GXTG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.99% for BINT.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.50% for GXTG.
Find the right allocation for BINT and GXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer