BETZ vs. BABW
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while BABW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. BETZ is passively managed, while BABW is actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BABW.
Performance
BETZ vs. BABW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -6.53% return, which is significantly higher than BABW's -29.04% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- -6.53%
- 1Y
- -15.03%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- -6.09%
- 10Y*
- —
BABW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -38.94%
- YTD
- -29.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETZ vs. BABW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -6.53% | -2.29% |
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -29.04% | -16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and BABW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. BABW — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BETZ vs. BABW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETZ | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. BABW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than BABW's maximum drawdown of -54.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and BABW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -54.76% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.77% | -44.98% | +8.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -25.69% | -8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.27% | — | — |
Volatility
BETZ vs. BABW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.76% | 50.41% | -29.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 50.41% | -23.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.88% | 50.41% | -22.53% |
BETZ vs. BABW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BABW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETZ vs. BABW - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than BABW's 49.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 49.35% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 4.89% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and BABW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BETZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BETZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 49.35%, compared with 4.89% for BETZ.
BETZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while BABW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.99% for BABW.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and BABW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer