BCTK vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCTK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

BCTK vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCTK

• 1D: -4.03%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 20.77%
• 6M: 18.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -9.46%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCTK vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	0.47%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	19.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BCTK and ARMH is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.77

Return for Risk

BCTK vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

BCTK vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCTK	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.96%	-24.85%	+10.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.96%	-16.34%	+10.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-7.72%	+4.54%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCTK	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.13%	122.02%	-91.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.13%	122.02%	-91.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.13%	122.02%	-91.89%

BCTK vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCTK vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCTK nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCTK and ARMH in my portfolio?

BCTK and ARMH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCTK or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCTK or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCTK or ARMH?

BCTK and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BCTK and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.19% for ARMH.