BCTK vs. SMH
BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. BCTK is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCTK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
BCTK vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 27.46% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
BCTK
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 15.19%
- YTD
- 27.46%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
BCTK vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 27.46% | 1.80% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCTK and SMH is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCTK vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
BCTK
SMH
BCTK vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCTK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.83 | 0.34 | +2.49 |
Drawdowns
BCTK vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCTK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -84.96% | +71.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | 0.00% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -41.09% | +38.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility
BCTK vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCTK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 30.56% | -3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.98% | 35.01% | -8.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.98% | 32.57% | -5.59% |
BCTK vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCTK vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
BCTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCTK and SMH have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for BCTK.
BCTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for BCTK and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer