BCTK vs. VGT
BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. BCTK is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCTK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
BCTK vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 28.43% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.
BCTK
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 16.79%
- YTD
- 28.43%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
BCTK vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 28.43% | 1.80% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCTK and VGT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCTK vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
BCTK
VGT
BCTK vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCTK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.97 | 0.68 | +2.29 |
Drawdowns
BCTK vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCTK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -54.63% | +40.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.48% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.02% | -7.95% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.13% | — |
Volatility
BCTK vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCTK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.06% | 20.57% | +6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 25.18% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 24.60% | +2.46% |
BCTK vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCTK vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
BCTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BCTK and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for BCTK.
They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for BCTK and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer