BCTK vs. CHPS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. BCTK is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BCTK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

BCTK vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 68.49% return.

BCTK

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: -7.64%
• 6M: 13.55%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -13.02%
• 6M: 42.22%
• YTD: 68.49%
• 1Y: 137.92%
• 3Y*: 46.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 46.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	$575.68K	$431.57K	$642.86K
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	$2.30M	$2.47M	$3.85M

BCTK vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	12.33%	0.84%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	68.49%	3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BCTK and CHPS is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

BCTK vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCTK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 92
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCTK vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCTK	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.97	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.42	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.14	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.64	—

Drawdowns

BCTK vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCTK	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.63%	-39.44%	+20.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-32.74%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.13%	-26.00%	+12.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-9.36%	+5.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCTK	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.35%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.80%	45.70%	-13.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.80%	37.29%	-5.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.80%	37.29%	-5.49%

BCTK vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCTK vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

BCTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.39%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCTK and CHPS in my portfolio?

BCTK and CHPS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCTK or CHPS?

On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCTK or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCTK or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for BCTK.

What is the main difference between BCTK and CHPS?

BCTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.15% for CHPS.