PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCTK vs. BCFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCTK vs. BCFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Baron Financials ETF (BCFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 27.46% return, which is significantly higher than BCFN's -17.02% return.


BCTK

1D
-0.76%
1M
15.19%
YTD
27.46%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCFN

1D
-2.00%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-17.02%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCTK vs. BCFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCTK
Baron Technology ETF
27.46%1.80%
BCFN
Baron Financials ETF
-17.02%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BCTK and BCFN is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCTK vs. BCFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Baron Financials ETF (BCFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCTK vs. BCFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCTKBCFNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.83

-1.70

+4.53

Drawdowns

BCTK vs. BCFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, smaller than the maximum BCFN drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and BCFN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCTKBCFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-20.95%

+6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-19.09%

+18.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-12.17%

+9.17%

Volatility

BCTK vs. BCFN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCTKBCFNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.98%

19.41%

+7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.98%

19.41%

+7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.98%

19.41%

+7.57%

BCTK vs. BCFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFN's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCTK vs. BCFN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCTK nor BCFN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BCTK and BCFN have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCTK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCTK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.

BCTK and BCFN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BCTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BCFN is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.80% for BCFN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCTK and BCFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer