BCTK vs. BITW
BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while BITW is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index. BCTK is actively managed, while BITW is passively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
BCTK vs. BITW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than BITW's -31.06% return.
BCTK
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BITW
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- -27.22%
- YTD
- -31.06%
- 1Y
- -42.99%
- 3Y*
- 48.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $575.68K | $431.57K | $642.86K | |
| $1.41M | $1.46M | $2.56M |
BCTK vs. BITW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 12.33% | 0.84% |
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | -31.06% | -3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCTK and BITW is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCTK vs. BITW — Risk / Return Rank
BCTK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITW
BCTK vs. BITW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCTK | BITW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCTK vs. BITW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, smaller than the maximum BITW drawdown of -96.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and BITW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCTK | BITW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.63% | -96.46% | +77.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.13% | -70.86% | +57.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -69.58% | +65.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 36.89% | — |
Volatility
BCTK vs. BITW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCTK | BITW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.80% | 49.79% | -17.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 63.94% | -32.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 107.44% | -75.64% |
BCTK vs. BITW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BCTK and BITW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
BCTK vs. BITW - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCTK nor BITW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCTK and BITW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCTK and BITW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
BCTK and BITW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BCTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITW is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Bitwise.
Find the right allocation for BCTK and BITW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer