BCTK vs. BITW
BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while BITW is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index. BCTK is actively managed, while BITW is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
BCTK vs. BITW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than BITW's -32.35% return.
BCTK
- 1D
- -4.03%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 20.77%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITW
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -17.92%
- YTD
- -32.35%
- 6M
- -32.63%
- 1Y
- -35.22%
- 3Y*
- 52.08%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- —
BCTK vs. BITW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 20.77% | 0.84% |
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | -32.35% | -3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCTK and BITW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCTK vs. BITW — Risk / Return Rank
BCTK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITW
BCTK vs. BITW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCTK | BITW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCTK vs. BITW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, smaller than the maximum BITW drawdown of -96.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and BITW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCTK | BITW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -96.46% | +82.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -71.40% | +65.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -69.56% | +66.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.56% | — |
Volatility
BCTK vs. BITW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCTK | BITW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 49.87% | -19.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 65.59% | -35.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 108.35% | -78.22% |
BCTK vs. BITW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BCTK and BITW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
BCTK vs. BITW - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCTK nor BITW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCTK and BITW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCTK and BITW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
BCTK and BITW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BCTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITW is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Bitwise.
Find the right allocation for BCTK and BITW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer