BATT vs. GAMR
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR).
BATT and GAMR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BATT is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018. GAMR is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. It was launched on Mar 7, 2016.
Performance
BATT vs. GAMR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BATT vs. GAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 8.99% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -32.25% | 16.52% | 44.43% | -2.40% | -42.45% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | -16.53% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -36.96% | 11.31% | 76.83% | 14.76% | -27.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly higher than GAMR's -16.53% return.
BATT
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 82.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- —
GAMR
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- -16.53%
- 6M
- -21.80%
- 1Y
- 12.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- -4.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BATT vs. GAMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BATT and GAMR have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Return for Risk
BATT vs. GAMR — Risk / Return Rank
BATT
GAMR
BATT vs. GAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATT | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.56 | 0.47 | +2.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 0.84 | +2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.11 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 0.50 | +4.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 1.36 | +15.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATT | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 0.47 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.20 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.48 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT and GAMR is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BATT vs. GAMR - Dividend Comparison
BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than GAMR's 0.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.70% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.62% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BATT vs. GAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than GAMR's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and GAMR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATT | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -55.37% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.58% | -29.36% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.98% | -51.75% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.47% | -30.45% | +14.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.40% | -22.14% | -13.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 10.89% | -6.02% |
Volatility
BATT vs. GAMR - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) at 8.85%. This indicates that BATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BATT | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.38% | 8.85% | +3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.10% | 17.68% | +7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.28% | 27.41% | +4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.24% | 24.25% | +4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.55% | 24.18% | +6.37% |