GAMR vs. SPUS
GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) and SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAMR returned -0.52%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for SPUS. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAMR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPUS.
Performance
GAMR vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.82% return.
GAMR
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 13.55%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- —
GAMR vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 3.68% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -36.96% | 11.31% | 76.83% | 0.97% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 15.82% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAMR and SPUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between GAMR and SPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
GAMR vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GAMR
SPUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
GAMR
SPUS
Communication Services
GAMR
SPUS
Consumer Cyclical
GAMR
SPUS
Financial Services
GAMR
SPUS
-
Basic Materials
GAMR
-
SPUS
Consumer Defensive
GAMR
-
SPUS
Energy
GAMR
-
SPUS
Healthcare
GAMR
-
SPUS
Industrials
GAMR
-
SPUS
Real Estate
GAMR
-
SPUS
Utilities
GAMR
-
SPUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAMR vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
GAMR
SPUS
GAMR vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAMR | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.49 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 3.79 | -3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.55 | 16.32 | -14.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAMR | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.86 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.91 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.91 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
GAMR vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and SPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAMR | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -30.80% | -24.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.36% | -10.66% | -18.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | -22.82% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.57% | -28.06% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.61% | -0.86% | -12.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -6.21% | -15.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.82% | 2.47% | +10.35% |
Volatility
GAMR vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 4.00%. This indicates that GAMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAMR | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 4.00% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 10.84% | +6.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.32% | 14.16% | +8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 19.23% | +5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 21.28% | +2.99% |
GAMR vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAMR vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SPUS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.52% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAMR and SPUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAMR has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to SPUS (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs SPUS's -30.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs -0.52% for GAMR. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs -0.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GAMR.
SPUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.50% for GAMR.
GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while SPUS is S&P 500. GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.45% for SPUS.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAMR and SPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer