GAMR vs. ESPO
GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both Gaming funds - GAMR tracks the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index while ESPO tracks the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAMR returned 0.86%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for ESPO. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GAMR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
GAMR vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -9.09% return.
GAMR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.42%
ESPO
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -9.09%
- 1Y
- -10.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.98M | $1.50M | $1.55M | |
| $69.51K | $68.28K | $108.93K |
GAMR vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 3.02% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -36.96% | 11.31% | 76.83% | 14.76% | -11.93% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -9.09% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAMR and ESPO is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between GAMR and ESPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
GAMR vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GAMR
ESPO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
GAMR
ESPO
Communication Services
GAMR
ESPO
Consumer Cyclical
GAMR
ESPO
Financial Services
GAMR
ESPO
-
Basic Materials
GAMR
-
ESPO
-
Consumer Defensive
GAMR
-
ESPO
-
Energy
GAMR
-
ESPO
-
Healthcare
GAMR
-
ESPO
-
Industrials
GAMR
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
GAMR
-
ESPO
-
Utilities
GAMR
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAMR vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
GAMR
ESPO
GAMR vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAMR | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.92 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.39 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | -0.62 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAMR vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAMR | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -50.99% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.36% | -29.43% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | -29.43% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.57% | -48.33% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.16% | -22.03% | +7.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -15.23% | -6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.55% | 18.32% | -4.77% |
Volatility
GAMR vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) have volatilities of 6.33% and 6.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAMR | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 6.66% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.39% | 16.07% | +3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.84% | 19.65% | +4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 25.12% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 25.65% | -1.27% |
GAMR vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAMR vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than ESPO's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.37% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAMR and ESPO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to GAMR (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 8.32% vs 0.86% for GAMR. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, GAMR has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GAMR.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.50% for GAMR.
GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.55% for ESPO.
GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAMR and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer