GAMR vs. EA
GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) is Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while EA (Electronic Arts Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GAMR returned 12.82%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for EA. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GAMR vs. EA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly higher than EA's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GAMR has outperformed EA with an annualized return of 12.82%, while EA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.58% annualized return.
GAMR
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 13.55%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
EA
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 39.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
GAMR vs. EA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 3.68% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -36.96% | 11.31% | 76.83% | 14.76% | -18.82% | 59.47% |
EA Electronic Arts Inc. | -0.64% | 40.33% | 7.49% | 12.67% | -6.84% | -7.69% | 33.75% | 36.24% | -24.89% | 33.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAMR and EA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2016 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GAMR and EA has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAMR vs. EA — Risk / Return Rank
GAMR
EA
GAMR vs. EA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Electronic Arts Inc. (EA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAMR | EA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.84 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 3.88 | -2.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.66 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 5.27 | -4.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.55 | 16.53 | -14.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAMR | EA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.84 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.31 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.38 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.39 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
GAMR vs. EA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum EA drawdown of -84.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and EA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAMR | EA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -84.24% | +28.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.36% | -7.46% | -21.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | -30.54% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.57% | -30.54% | -20.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.37% | -49.83% | -5.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.61% | -0.87% | -12.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -26.23% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.82% | 2.37% | +10.45% |
Volatility
GAMR vs. EA - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) at 0.99%. This indicates that GAMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAMR | EA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 0.99% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 4.26% | +13.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.32% | 21.36% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 23.85% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 27.73% | -3.46% |
Dividends
GAMR vs. EA - Dividend Comparison
GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than EA's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EA Electronic Arts Inc. | 0.38% | 0.37% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.52% | 0.12% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAMR and EA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAMR has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to EA (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs EA's -84.24%.
EA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAMR and EA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer