GAMR vs. GABF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. GAMR is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GAMR returned 13.81%/yr vs 21.50%/yr for GABF. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAMR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

GAMR vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -4.42% return.

GAMR

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -3.32%
• 6M: -4.19%
• 1Y: 9.28%
• 3Y*: 13.81%
• 5Y*: -1.32%
• 10Y*: 12.32%

GABF

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: -4.42%
• 6M: -5.68%
• 1Y: -1.50%
• 3Y*: 21.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAMR vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	-3.32%	39.20%	11.23%	6.89%	-8.76%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-4.42%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GAMR and GABF is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.56

The correlation between GAMR and GABF shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GAMR vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GAMR	GABF
Technology	65.4%	5.2%
Communication Services	25.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	85.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	4.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GAMR vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAMR

GAMR Risk / Return Rank: 13
GAMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
GAMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
GAMR Omega Ratio Rank: 15
GAMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
GAMR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 8
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAMR vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAMR	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	-0.09	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	0.00	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.00	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	-0.09	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.71	-0.20	+0.91

GAMR vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAMR and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GAMR vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAMR	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	-20.86%	-34.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.36%	-17.16%	-12.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.36%	-20.86%	-8.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.45%	-9.12%	-10.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.10%	-4.90%	-17.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.13%	7.55%	+5.58%

Volatility

GAMR vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.38%. This indicates that GAMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAMR	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.32%	4.38%	+3.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.46%	13.29%	+5.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.24%	17.47%	+5.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.55%	20.48%	+4.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.35%	20.48%	+3.87%

GAMR vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAMR vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than GABF's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.05%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	0.54%	0.52%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAMR and GABF in my portfolio?

GAMR and GABF have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAMR or GABF?

GAMR has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to GABF (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, GAMR or GABF?

On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 21.50% vs 13.81% for GAMR. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GAMR or GABF?

Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 21.50% return vs 13.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAMR or GABF?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GAMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAMR or GABF?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.54% for GAMR.

What is the main difference between GAMR and GABF?

GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.