PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAMR vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAMR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, GAMR has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 12.22%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.


GAMR

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.45%
6M
8.06%
YTD
3.02%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
14.92%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
12.22%
ALL TIME*
13.42%

SPY

1D
0.72%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.07%
ALL TIME*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$69.51K$68.28K$108.93K
$37.27B$35.99B$39.23B

GAMR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
3.02%39.20%11.23%6.89%-36.96%11.31%76.83%14.76%-18.82%59.47%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GAMR and SPY is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2016

0.69

The correlation between GAMR and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GAMR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GAMR
SPY

Technology

66.2%
36.9%

Communication Services

19.6%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
8.9%

Financial Services

0.6%
12.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

3.4%

Healthcare

-

9.4%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Technology

GAMR
66.2%
SPY
36.9%

Communication Services

GAMR
19.6%
SPY
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GAMR
11.2%
SPY
8.9%

Financial Services

GAMR
0.6%
SPY
12.5%

Basic Materials

GAMR

-

SPY
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

GAMR

-

SPY
4.8%

Energy

GAMR

-

SPY
3.4%

Healthcare

GAMR

-

SPY
9.4%

Industrials

GAMR

-

SPY
7.6%

Real Estate

GAMR

-

SPY
2.0%

Utilities

GAMR

-

SPY
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAMR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GAMR
GAMR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GAMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAMR Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GAMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GAMR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAMRSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.27

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

2.20

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

9.40

-9.05

GAMR vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAMR and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAMR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAMRSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-55.19%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.36%

-8.88%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.36%

-18.76%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.57%

-24.50%

-26.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.37%

-33.72%

-21.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.16%

-1.40%

-12.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.03%

-9.01%

-13.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.55%

2.08%

+11.47%

Volatility

GAMR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that GAMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAMRSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

3.58%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.39%

10.14%

+9.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.84%

12.89%

+10.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

17.18%

+7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.38%

17.95%

+6.43%

GAMR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAMR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SPY's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
0.50%0.52%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAMR and SPY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAMR has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.07% vs 12.22% for GAMR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GAMR.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.50% for GAMR.

GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while SPY is S&P 500. GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAMR and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer