PortfoliosLab logo
BATT vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BATT and VOO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

BATT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-57.20%
105.12%
BATT
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BATT:

-0.70

VOO:

-0.07

Sortino Ratio

BATT:

-0.88

VOO:

0.01

Omega Ratio

BATT:

0.90

VOO:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

BATT:

-0.33

VOO:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

BATT:

-2.07

VOO:

-0.36

Ulcer Index

BATT:

9.42%

VOO:

3.31%

Daily Std Dev

BATT:

27.77%

VOO:

15.79%

Max Drawdown

BATT:

-69.38%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

BATT:

-59.44%

VOO:

-17.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a -16.48% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -13.30% return.


BATT

YTD

-16.48%

1M

-15.03%

6M

-23.21%

1Y

-19.04%

5Y*

4.54%

10Y*

N/A

VOO

YTD

-13.30%

1M

-12.91%

6M

-11.02%

1Y

0.06%

5Y*

17.17%

10Y*

11.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BATT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for BATT: current value is 0.59%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BATT: 0.59%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value is 0.03%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
VOO: 0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BATT vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BATT is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BATT is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BATT is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BATT is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BATT is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BATT is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BATT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BATT, currently valued at -0.70, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00
BATT: -0.70
VOO: -0.07
The chart of Sortino ratio for BATT, currently valued at -0.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
BATT: -0.88
VOO: 0.01
The chart of Omega ratio for BATT, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
BATT: 0.90
VOO: 1.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for BATT, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
BATT: -0.33
VOO: -0.07
The chart of Martin ratio for BATT, currently valued at -2.07, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00
BATT: -2.07
VOO: -0.36

The current BATT Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATT and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.70
-0.07
BATT
VOO

Dividends

BATT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than VOO's 1.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
3.80%3.17%3.23%4.14%2.32%0.22%3.22%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.50%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

BATT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-59.44%
-17.13%
BATT
VOO

Volatility

BATT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a higher volatility of 11.25% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 9.12%. This indicates that BATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11.25%
9.12%
BATT
VOO

User Portfolios with BATT or VOO


BTAL
GLD
UUP
QQQ
SPMO
1 / 56

Recent discussions