BABW vs. BUCK
BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
BABW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 2.55% return.
BABW
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 40.41%
- 6M
- -26.50%
- YTD
- -16.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 5.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.31K | $74.82K | $59.98K | |
| $4.11M | $3.83M | $4.04M |
BABW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -16.68% | -16.98% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 2.55% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABW and BUCK is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BUCK
BABW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 30.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.76% | -5.43% | -49.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.40% | -0.04% | -35.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -0.47% | -26.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility
BABW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.46% | 2.47% | +47.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 3.42% | +47.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 3.42% | +47.04% |
BABW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.79%, more than BUCK's 7.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 45.79% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.19% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABW and BUCK have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 45.79%, compared with 7.19% for BUCK.
BABW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for BABW and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer