BUCK vs. AGGH
BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) and AGGH (Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while AGGH is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BUCK returned 5.26%/yr vs 4.81%/yr for AGGH. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUCK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AGGH.
Performance
BUCK vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUCK achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 0.80% return.
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGGH
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 1.88% | 4.13% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 0.39% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.80% | 8.23% | 1.97% | 8.47% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUCK and AGGH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022 | 0.26 |
BUCK vs. AGGH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUCK
AGGH
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BUCK
AGGH
Basic Materials
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Communication Services
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Consumer Defensive
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Energy
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Healthcare
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Industrials
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Real Estate
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Technology
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Utilities
BUCK
-
AGGH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUCK vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank
BUCK
AGGH
BUCK vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUCK | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 1.32 | +1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.81 | 1.99 | +1.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.26 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.49 | 2.95 | +2.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.09 | 8.66 | +20.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUCK | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.32 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 0.28 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
BUCK vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUCK drawdown since its inception was -5.43%, smaller than the maximum AGGH drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUCK and AGGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUCK | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -13.26% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.31% | -3.10% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.43% | -8.67% | +3.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -1.26% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -4.45% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 1.06% | -0.81% |
Volatility
BUCK vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) is 0.70%, while Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that BUCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUCK | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 1.52% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 3.35% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 7.10% | -3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.49% | 8.46% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.49% | 8.46% | -4.97% |
BUCK vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUCK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUCK vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison
BUCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, less than AGGH's 7.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.50% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.42% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUCK and AGGH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGGH has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUCK dropped -5.43% vs AGGH's -13.26%.
On 3-year performance, BUCK leads with 5.26% vs 4.81% for AGGH. On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 5.26% return vs 4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.
AGGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.50%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.
BUCK is categorized as Government Bonds, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BUCK and 0.33% for AGGH.
BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUCK and AGGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer