PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUCK vs. AGGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUCK vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUCK achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 0.80% return.


BUCK

1D
0.06%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
10Y*

AGGH

1D
0.05%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.80%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUCK vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.88%4.13%7.25%4.63%0.39%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
0.80%8.23%1.97%8.47%1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BUCK and AGGH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022

0.26

BUCK vs. AGGH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUCK
AGGH

Financial Services

100.0%
79.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BUCK
100.0%
AGGH
79.5%

Basic Materials

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Communication Services

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Consumer Cyclical

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Consumer Defensive

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Energy

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Healthcare

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Industrials

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Real Estate

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Technology

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Utilities

BUCK

-

AGGH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUCK vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUCK vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUCKAGGHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

1.32

+1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.81

1.99

+1.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.26

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.49

2.95

+2.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.09

8.66

+20.43

BUCK vs. AGGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUCK Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the AGGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUCK and AGGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUCKAGGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.32

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.28

+1.19

Drawdowns

BUCK vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUCK drawdown since its inception was -5.43%, smaller than the maximum AGGH drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUCK and AGGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUCKAGGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-13.26%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-3.10%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

-8.67%

+3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-1.26%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-4.45%

+3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

1.06%

-0.81%

Volatility

BUCK vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) is 0.70%, while Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that BUCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUCKAGGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

1.52%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

3.35%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22%

7.10%

-3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.49%

8.46%

-4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.49%

8.46%

-4.97%

BUCK vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUCK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUCK vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison

BUCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, less than AGGH's 7.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.50%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUCK and AGGH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGGH has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUCK dropped -5.43% vs AGGH's -13.26%.

On 3-year performance, BUCK leads with 5.26% vs 4.81% for AGGH. On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 5.26% return vs 4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

AGGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.50%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

BUCK is categorized as Government Bonds, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BUCK and 0.33% for AGGH.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUCK and AGGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer