PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BUCK vs. MTBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BUCKMTBA
YTD Return5.44%4.30%
Daily Std Dev3.36%4.72%
Max Drawdown-2.03%-2.55%
Current Drawdown-0.44%-0.21%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between BUCK and MTBA is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BUCK vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BUCK achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's 4.30% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.69%
4.82%
BUCK
MTBA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUCK vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUCK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.


BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for BUCK: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%
Expense ratio chart for MTBA: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BUCK vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUCK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 3.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 12.56, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.56
MTBA
Sharpe ratio
No data

BUCK vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

BUCK vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

BUCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, more than MTBA's 4.33% yield.


TTM20232022
BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
8.05%4.84%0.57%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
4.33%0.48%0.00%

Drawdowns

BUCK vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUCK drawdown since its inception was -2.03%, smaller than the maximum MTBA drawdown of -2.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUCK and MTBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.44%
-0.21%
BUCK
MTBA

Volatility

BUCK vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 0.62%. This indicates that BUCK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.32%
0.62%
BUCK
MTBA