BUCK vs. TUA
BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) and TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while TUA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BUCK returned 5.24%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for TUA. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BUCK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for TUA.
Performance
BUCK vs. TUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUCK achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than TUA's -6.16% return.
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.10%
TUA
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 1Y
- -5.03%
- 3Y*
- 0.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.71M | $3.67M | $3.97M | |
| $11.78M | $10.08M | $8.27M |
BUCK vs. TUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 2.60% | 4.13% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 0.39% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -6.16% | 7.27% | -3.59% | -2.04% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUCK and TUA is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUCK vs. TUA — Risk / Return Rank
BUCK
TUA
BUCK vs. TUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) and Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUCK | TUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.89 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.65 | -0.63 | +7.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.30 | -1.37 | +32.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUCK vs. TUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUCK drawdown since its inception was -5.43%, smaller than the maximum TUA drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUCK and TUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUCK | TUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -15.85% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.84% | -7.96% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.43% | -9.14% | +3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.79% | +10.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -8.45% | +7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 3.67% | -3.49% |
Volatility
BUCK vs. TUA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) is 0.42%, while Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that BUCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUCK | TUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 1.86% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.25% | 5.57% | -4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 6.59% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.42% | 10.65% | -7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.42% | 10.65% | -7.23% |
BUCK vs. TUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUCK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TUA's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUCK vs. TUA - Dividend Comparison
BUCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than TUA's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.19% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.11% | 3.84% | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUCK and TUA have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUA has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to BUCK (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUCK dropped -5.43% vs TUA's -15.85%.
On 3-year performance, BUCK leads with 5.24% vs 0.30% for TUA. On fees, TUA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 5.24% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TUA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.
BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 3.11% for TUA.
BUCK is categorized as Government Bonds, while TUA is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BUCK and 0.16% for TUA.
BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUCK and TUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer