ATMP vs. BSMU
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and BSMU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while BSMU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ATMP returned 18.49%/yr vs -1.07%/yr for BSMU. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMU.
Performance
ATMP vs. BSMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 26.22% return, which is significantly higher than BSMU's -0.34% return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- YTD
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.84%
BSMU
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.49%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $521.25K | $462.49K | $511.48K | |
| $923.23K | $1.24M | $1.23M |
ATMP vs. BSMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 26.22% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | 18.45% |
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF | -0.34% | 4.35% | -0.29% | 6.31% | -13.76% | 1.88% | 4.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and BSMU is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ATMP and BSMU has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. BSMU — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
BSMU
ATMP vs. BSMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | BSMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 1.50 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 3.91 | +2.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. BSMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than BSMU's maximum drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and BSMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | BSMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -19.48% | -61.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -2.06% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -4.82% | -11.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -19.14% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -5.69% | +4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.81% | -8.10% | -22.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 0.79% | +2.75% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. BSMU - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) at 0.64%. This indicates that ATMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | BSMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 0.64% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 1.65% | +10.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 2.14% | +12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 4.81% | +17.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 4.79% | +22.83% |
ATMP vs. BSMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMU's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATMP vs. BSMU - Dividend Comparison
ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.81% | 2.82% | 2.92% | 2.66% | 2.16% | 1.60% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and BSMU have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATMP has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to BSMU (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs BSMU's -19.48%.
On 5-year performance, ATMP leads with 18.49% vs -1.07% for BSMU. On fees, BSMU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ATMP has performed better with a 18.49% return vs -1.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
BSMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
ATMP is categorized as MLPs, while BSMU is Municipal Bonds. ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while BSMU tracks Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.18% for BSMU.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and BSMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer