BSMU vs. QIS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF) and QIS (Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index, while QIS is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Simplify. BSMU is passively managed, while QIS is actively managed. Over the past year, BSMU returned 5.50% vs -43.22% for QIS. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. BSMU charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for QIS.

Performance

BSMU vs. QIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMU achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than QIS's -16.19% return.

BSMU

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 5.50%
• 3Y*: 3.02%
• 5Y*: -0.68%
• 10Y*: —

QIS

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -10.18%
• YTD: -16.19%
• 6M: -22.01%
• 1Y: -43.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMU vs. QIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF	0.56%	4.35%	-0.29%	3.85%
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	-16.19%	-38.02%	0.19%	1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMU and QIS is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023	-0.04

The correlation between BSMU and QIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSMU vs. QIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSMU	QIS
Financial Services	1.2%	10.0%
Basic Materials	-	3.9%
Communication Services	-	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.0%
Energy	-	6.8%
Healthcare	-	13.9%
Industrials	-	15.8%
Real Estate	-	4.1%
Technology	-	24.7%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

BSMU vs. QIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMU

BSMU Risk / Return Rank: 72
BSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 50

QIS

QIS Risk / Return Rank: 1
QIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
QIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
QIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
QIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
QIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMU vs. QIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMU	QIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	-1.13	+3.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	-1.68	+5.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	0.80	+0.76
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	-0.85	+3.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.28	-1.45	+9.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSMU vs. QIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the QIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMU and QIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMU	QIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	-1.13	+3.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	-0.67	+0.74

Drawdowns

BSMU vs. QIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMU drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, smaller than the maximum QIS drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMU and QIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMU	QIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.48%	-55.49%	+36.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.06%	-50.92%	+48.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-50.86%	+46.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-13.73%	+5.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	29.89%	-29.22%

Volatility

BSMU vs. QIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) is 0.79%, while Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a volatility of 15.94%. This indicates that BSMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSMU	QIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	15.94%	-15.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.48%	30.68%	-29.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13%	38.29%	-36.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.83%	29.26%	-24.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.85%	29.26%	-24.41%

BSMU vs. QIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QIS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSMU vs. QIS - Dividend Comparison

BSMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than QIS's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF	2.80%	2.82%	2.92%	2.66%	2.16%	1.60%	0.28%
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	1.61%	3.37%	1.07%	3.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMU and QIS in my portfolio?

BSMU and QIS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSMU or QIS?

QIS has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to BSMU (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMU dropped -19.48% vs QIS's -55.49%.

Which ETF is better, BSMU or QIS?

On 1-year performance, BSMU leads with 5.50% vs -43.22% for QIS. On fees, BSMU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSMU or QIS?

Over the 1-year period, BSMU has performed better with a 5.50% return vs -43.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMU or QIS?

BSMU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMU or QIS?

BSMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.61% for QIS.

What is the main difference between BSMU and QIS?

BSMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QIS is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMU and 1.00% for QIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.