BSMU vs. XLEI
BSMU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF) and XLEI (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index, while XLEI is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Energy Select Sector. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. BSMU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLEI.
Performance
BSMU vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMU achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than XLEI's 16.48% return.
BSMU
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 4.28%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- -0.83%
- 10Y*
- —
XLEI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 16.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMU vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.75% | 3.49% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 16.48% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMU and XLEI is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMU vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank
BSMU
XLEI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSMU vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSMU | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSMU vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMU drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, which is greater than XLEI's maximum drawdown of -8.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMU and XLEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMU | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.48% | -8.19% | -11.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -4.21% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -1.90% | -6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | — | — |
Volatility
BSMU vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMU | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11% | 14.04% | -11.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.81% | 14.04% | -9.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.81% | 14.04% | -9.23% |
BSMU vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMU vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison
BSMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than XLEI's 19.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.79% | 2.82% | 2.92% | 2.66% | 2.16% | 1.60% | 0.28% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 19.64% | 10.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMU and XLEI have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLEI.
XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 19.64%, compared with 2.79% for BSMU.
BSMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XLEI is Energy Equities. BSMU tracks Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index, while XLEI tracks S&P Energy Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMU and 0.35% for XLEI.
Find the right allocation for BSMU and XLEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer