PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASG vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASG vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty All-Star Growth (ASG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASG achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ASG has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 11.08%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.86% annualized return.


ASG

1D
0.78%
1M
-3.71%
6M
2.29%
YTD
3.61%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
-1.04%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
4.87%

NOBL

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.09%
6M
4.89%
YTD
10.84%
1Y
15.41%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
9.86%
ALL TIME*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.74M$1.40M$1.42M
$66.40M$66.46M$60.79M

ASG vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASG
Liberty All-Star Growth
3.61%2.21%16.78%16.23%-40.91%22.60%37.99%60.54%-14.35%44.64%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
10.84%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ASG and NOBL is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between ASG and NOBL has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASG vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASG
ASG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASG vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty All-Star Growth (ASG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASGNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.21

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

1.62

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.44

4.10

-3.66

ASG vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASG Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASG and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASG vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASG drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASG and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASGNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.77%

-35.43%

-31.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.77%

-9.11%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.25%

-15.36%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.91%

-17.92%

-27.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.91%

-35.43%

-10.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.48%

-2.31%

-17.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.61%

-3.46%

-14.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

3.59%

+0.77%

Volatility

ASG vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Liberty All-Star Growth (ASG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) have volatilities of 5.29% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASGNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

5.07%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

9.11%

+5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

11.92%

+6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.75%

14.48%

+8.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.10%

16.63%

+8.47%

ASG vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASG has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASG vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

ASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASG
Liberty All-Star Growth
9.14%8.68%8.32%8.14%10.14%11.33%7.68%7.08%10.48%7.58%8.61%16.81%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.04%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASG and NOBL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASG has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to NOBL (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASG dropped -66.77% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASG and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer