PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASG vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty All-Star Growth (ASG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASG achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ASG has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.90%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return.


ASG

1D
0.75%
1M
4.05%
YTD
6.42%
6M
6.02%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
11.90%

SCHG

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.91%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.31%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASG
Liberty All-Star Growth
6.42%2.21%16.78%16.23%-40.91%22.60%37.99%60.54%-14.35%44.64%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.74%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ASG and SCHG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.69

The correlation between ASG and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASG
ASG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty All-Star Growth (ASG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASGSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

1.76

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

2.37

-1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.31

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

1.70

-0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.16

5.70

-2.53

ASG vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASG Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASG and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASGSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.76

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.73

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.88

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.85

-0.63

Drawdowns

ASG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASG drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASG and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASGSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.77%

-34.59%

-32.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.77%

-16.41%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.25%

-23.39%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.91%

-34.59%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.91%

-34.59%

-11.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.29%

-0.57%

-16.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.61%

-5.20%

-12.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

4.90%

-0.68%

Volatility

ASG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Liberty All-Star Growth (ASG) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.31%. This indicates that ASG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASGSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.31%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

11.56%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.37%

15.45%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.86%

22.27%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.05%

21.55%

+3.50%

ASG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASG has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

ASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASG
Liberty All-Star Growth
8.70%8.68%8.32%8.14%10.14%11.33%7.68%7.08%10.48%7.58%8.61%16.81%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASG and SCHG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASG has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASG dropped -66.77% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASG and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer