ASEA vs. BKEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM).
ASEA and BKEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASEA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 2011. BKEM is a passively managed fund by BNY Mellon that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2020. Both ASEA and BKEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ASEA vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASEA vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 6.01% | 19.80% | 9.82% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 4.66% | 31.10% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 5.83% | 30.55% | 7.53% | 8.68% | -19.43% | -3.91% | 47.53% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ASEA having a 6.01% return and BKEM slightly lower at 5.83%.
ASEA
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- 6.01%
- 6M
- 15.95%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
BKEM
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 33.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASEA vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASEA vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank
ASEA
BKEM
ASEA vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASEA | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.68 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 2.26 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.53 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.51 | 9.54 | +0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASEA | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.68 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.20 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.58 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASEA and BKEM is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ASEA vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison
ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than BKEM's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 3.73% | 3.95% | 3.61% | 3.76% | 2.23% | 4.19% | 2.27% | 2.51% | 3.08% | 1.59% | 2.78% | 3.64% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.76% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ASEA vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and BKEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASEA | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.16% | -39.48% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -13.11% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.20% | -36.65% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -9.96% | +4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -16.41% | +5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.48% | -0.73% |
Volatility
ASEA vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is 6.65%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that ASEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASEA | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 10.47% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 14.67% | -4.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 20.07% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 18.32% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 18.88% | -1.29% |