ASEA vs. FLLA
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA).
ASEA and FLLA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASEA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 2011. FLLA is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2018. Both ASEA and FLLA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASEA or FLLA.
Correlation
The correlation between ASEA and FLLA is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ASEA vs. FLLA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASEA:
0.59
FLLA:
-0.07
ASEA:
0.94
FLLA:
0.06
ASEA:
1.13
FLLA:
1.01
ASEA:
0.49
FLLA:
-0.05
ASEA:
1.45
FLLA:
-0.11
ASEA:
7.53%
FLLA:
13.43%
ASEA:
18.64%
FLLA:
21.90%
ASEA:
-44.14%
FLLA:
-53.87%
ASEA:
-10.36%
FLLA:
-10.28%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASEA achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than FLLA's 23.48% return.
ASEA
-0.43%
1.07%
-4.18%
12.10%
9.90%
3.00%
FLLA
23.48%
6.79%
8.32%
-3.16%
11.22%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASEA vs. FLLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLLA's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASEA vs. FLLA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ASEA
FLLA
ASEA vs. FLLA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASEA vs. FLLA - Dividend Comparison
ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than FLLA's 5.70% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 3.62% | 3.61% | 3.76% | 2.23% | 4.18% | 2.27% | 2.51% | 3.08% | 1.59% | 2.78% | 3.64% | 2.65% |
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 5.70% | 7.04% | 5.44% | 9.55% | 7.60% | 2.12% | 3.17% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ASEA vs. FLLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, smaller than the maximum FLLA drawdown of -53.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and FLLA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASEA vs. FLLA - Volatility Comparison
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) have volatilities of 11.81% and 12.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.