PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASEA vs. ASIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASEA vs. ASIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASEA vs. ASIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
6.01%19.80%9.82%4.66%
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
1.94%32.06%3.41%0.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASEA achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly higher than ASIA's 1.94% return.


ASEA

1D
2.16%
1M
-4.66%
YTD
6.01%
6M
15.95%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
6.92%

ASIA

1D
3.32%
1M
-10.98%
YTD
1.94%
6M
5.62%
1Y
35.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASEA vs. ASIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ASIA's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ASEA vs. ASIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASEA
ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ASIA
ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASEA vs. ASIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASEAASIADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.64

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.19

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.38

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.51

8.98

+1.53

ASEA vs. ASIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the ASIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASEA and ASIA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASEAASIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.64

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.73

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between ASEA and ASIA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ASEA vs. ASIA - Dividend Comparison

ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than ASIA's 1.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
3.73%3.95%3.61%3.76%2.23%4.19%2.27%2.51%3.08%1.59%2.78%3.64%
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
1.03%1.05%0.58%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ASEA vs. ASIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, which is greater than ASIA's maximum drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and ASIA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASEAASIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.16%

-23.95%

-20.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-14.47%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-11.63%

+5.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-5.00%

-5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.84%

-1.09%

Volatility

ASEA vs. ASIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is 6.65%, while Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that ASEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASEAASIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

11.40%

-4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

16.54%

-6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

21.58%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

19.47%

-4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

19.47%

-1.88%