PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASEA vs. EPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASEA vs. EPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASEA achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than EPI's -8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ASEA has underperformed EPI with an annualized return of 7.72%, while EPI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.14% annualized return.


ASEA

1D
1.51%
1M
3.06%
YTD
10.26%
6M
13.28%
1Y
25.68%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
7.72%

EPI

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
-8.75%
6M
-7.57%
1Y
-9.24%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASEA vs. EPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
10.26%19.80%9.82%4.88%5.24%4.66%-7.88%8.34%-7.58%35.06%
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
-8.75%2.25%10.70%26.03%-4.74%26.41%18.55%1.53%-9.88%39.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ASEA and EPI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2011

0.55

The correlation between ASEA and EPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASEA vs. EPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASEA
EPI

Financial Services

58.6%
23.4%

Industrials

15.4%
9.7%

Communication Services

8.8%
2.0%

Utilities

4.4%
8.4%

Energy

3.5%
17.3%

Real Estate

2.8%
0.9%

Healthcare

2.3%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.1%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Technology

-

8.3%

Financial Services

ASEA
58.6%
EPI
23.4%

Industrials

ASEA
15.4%
EPI
9.7%

Communication Services

ASEA
8.8%
EPI
2.0%

Utilities

ASEA
4.4%
EPI
8.4%

Energy

ASEA
3.5%
EPI
17.3%

Real Estate

ASEA
2.8%
EPI
0.9%

Healthcare

ASEA
2.3%
EPI
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

ASEA
2.2%
EPI
3.5%

Basic Materials

ASEA
2.1%
EPI
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ASEA

-

EPI
7.5%

Technology

ASEA

-

EPI
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASEA vs. EPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASEA
ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EPI
EPI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASEA vs. EPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASEAEPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

-0.62

+2.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

-0.81

+3.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.91

+0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

-0.51

+3.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.93

-1.27

+10.20

ASEA vs. EPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the EPI Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASEA and EPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASEAEPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

-0.62

+2.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.37

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.45

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.14

+0.14

Drawdowns

ASEA vs. EPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum EPI drawdown of -66.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and EPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASEAEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.16%

-66.21%

+22.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-16.88%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.20%

-21.89%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.20%

-21.89%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.16%

-50.29%

+6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-16.66%

+14.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-18.65%

+7.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

6.83%

-3.84%

Volatility

ASEA vs. EPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is 3.44%, while WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that ASEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASEAEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

4.79%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

12.75%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

14.89%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

16.20%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

20.35%

-2.76%

ASEA vs. EPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EPI's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASEA vs. EPI - Dividend Comparison

ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, while EPI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
3.58%3.95%3.61%3.76%2.23%4.19%2.27%2.51%3.08%1.59%2.78%3.64%
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
0.00%0.00%0.27%0.15%6.01%1.18%0.78%1.17%1.18%0.85%1.05%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASEA and EPI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPI has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to ASEA (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASEA dropped -44.16% vs EPI's -66.21%.

On 10-year performance, EPI leads with 9.14% vs 7.72% for ASEA. On fees, ASEA is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPI has performed better with a 9.14% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASEA is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.

ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.00% for EPI.

ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, while EPI tracks WisdomTree India Earnings Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASEA and 0.84% for EPI.

ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASEA and EPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer