PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASEA vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASEA vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASEA achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ASEA has underperformed VWO with an annualized return of 7.90%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.31% annualized return.


ASEA

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.26%
YTD
11.13%
6M
10.54%
1Y
30.97%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
7.90%

VWO

1D
0.77%
1M
3.96%
YTD
14.05%
6M
14.71%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASEA vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
11.13%19.80%9.82%4.88%5.24%4.66%-7.88%8.34%-7.58%35.06%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
14.05%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ASEA and VWO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2011

0.72

The correlation between ASEA and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

ASEA vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASEA
VWO

Financial Services

11.3%
16.8%

Industrials

6.3%
6.8%

Communication Services

4.0%
5.8%

Energy

3.2%
3.6%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.8%

Utilities

1.5%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
3.1%

Healthcare

1.0%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
8.7%

Basic Materials

0.5%
7.0%

Technology

-

31.6%

Financial Services

ASEA
11.3%
VWO
16.8%

Industrials

ASEA
6.3%
VWO
6.8%

Communication Services

ASEA
4.0%
VWO
5.8%

Energy

ASEA
3.2%
VWO
3.6%

Real Estate

ASEA
2.8%
VWO
1.8%

Utilities

ASEA
1.5%
VWO
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

ASEA
1.3%
VWO
3.1%

Healthcare

ASEA
1.0%
VWO
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ASEA
0.9%
VWO
8.7%

Basic Materials

ASEA
0.5%
VWO
7.0%

Technology

ASEA

-

VWO
31.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASEA vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASEA
ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASEA vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASEAVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

2.89

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

10.19

-0.08

ASEA vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASEA and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASEA vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASEAVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.16%

-67.68%

+23.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-11.17%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.20%

-17.37%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.20%

-32.60%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.16%

-36.39%

-7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

0.00%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-15.79%

+5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.16%

-0.09%

Volatility

ASEA vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is 4.22%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that ASEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASEAVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

6.57%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

14.28%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

16.67%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

17.53%

-2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

19.24%

-1.66%

ASEA vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASEA vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than VWO's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
3.55%3.95%3.61%3.76%2.23%4.19%2.27%2.51%3.08%1.59%2.78%3.64%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.26%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASEA and VWO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to ASEA (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASEA dropped -44.16% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 9.31% vs 7.90% for ASEA. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 9.31% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASEA.

ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.26% for VWO.

ASEA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASEA and 0.08% for VWO.

ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASEA and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer