ARMH vs. LVHD
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. ARMH is actively managed, while LVHD is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.71, they often move in opposite directions. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
ARMH vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- -20.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 11.64%
- YTD
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
ARMH vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -3.02% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and LVHD is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LVHD
ARMH vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -37.32% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | -0.82% | -31.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -4.02% | -11.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.58% | 10.30% | +95.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 12.99% | +92.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 15.55% | +90.03% |
ARMH vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ARMH vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.21% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and LVHD have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while LVHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.27% for LVHD.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer