ALB vs. SSRM
ALB (Albemarle Corporation) and SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — ALB in Specialty Chemicals, SSRM in Gold. Over the past 10 years, ALB returned 7.95%/yr vs 9.56%/yr for SSRM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALB vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 21.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ALB has underperformed SSRM with an annualized return of 7.95%, while SSRM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.56% annualized return.
ALB
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -26.38%
- YTD
- 6.20%
- 6M
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- 154.84%
- 3Y*
- -10.75%
- 5Y*
- -1.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
SSRM
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -22.19%
- YTD
- 21.40%
- 6M
- 26.71%
- 1Y
- 108.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
ALB vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 6.20% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% | 50.22% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 21.40% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | 4.41% | 59.31% | 37.54% | -1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALB and SSRM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 1996 | 0.16 |
The correlation between ALB and SSRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (10 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ALB:
$17.77B
SSRM:
$5.79B
ALB:
-$2.33
SSRM:
$3.27
ALB:
3.22
SSRM:
3.04
ALB:
2.33
SSRM:
1.31
ALB:
$5.49B
SSRM:
$1.90B
ALB:
$1.02B
SSRM:
$643.76M
ALB:
$801.97M
SSRM:
$835.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALB vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank
ALB
SSRM
ALB vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALB | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 3.55 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.62 | 9.43 | +6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALB | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.66 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.17 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.18 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.10 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
ALB vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -83.90%, smaller than the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and SSRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALB | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.90% | -91.68% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.51% | -30.88% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.60% | -73.41% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | -83.16% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | -83.16% | -0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.65% | -38.87% | -12.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.67% | -57.17% | +36.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.95% | 11.59% | -1.64% |
Volatility
ALB vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is 12.42%, while SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a volatility of 18.01%. This indicates that ALB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALB | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.42% | 18.01% | -5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 53.47% | -11.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.95% | 66.17% | -4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.44% | 55.82% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.23% | 52.90% | -4.67% |
Dividends
ALB vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison
ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ALB vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALB vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison
ALB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 500.97M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
SSRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ALB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of 233.51M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
SSRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.
ALB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of 277.40M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
SSRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALB and SSRM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSRM has higher volatility (18.01%) compared to ALB (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALB dropped -83.90% vs SSRM's -91.68%.
ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALB and SSRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer