PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSRM vs. COMP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SSRM vs. COMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and Compass, Inc. (COMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a 40.15% return, which is significantly higher than COMP's -7.47% return.


SSRM

1D
-0.74%
1M
3.36%
YTD
40.15%
6M
31.85%
1Y
141.13%
3Y*
30.85%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
10.37%

COMP

1D
-2.30%
1M
16.43%
YTD
-7.47%
6M
-8.77%
1Y
59.80%
3Y*
47.14%
5Y*
-6.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSRM vs. COMP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
40.15%214.94%-35.32%-29.94%-10.02%25.04%
COMP
Compass, Inc.
-7.47%80.68%55.59%61.37%-74.37%-57.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SSRM and COMP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SSRM:

$6.69B

COMP:

$8.05B

EPS

SSRM:

$3.27

COMP:

$0.02

PE Ratio

SSRM:

9.41

COMP:

439.52

PS Ratio

SSRM:

3.51

COMP:

0.75

PB Ratio

SSRM:

1.51

COMP:

2.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

SSRM:

$1.90B

COMP:

$8.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SSRM:

$643.76M

COMP:

$893.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

SSRM:

$835.27M

COMP:

-$177.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSRM vs. COMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSRM
SSRM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SSRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SSRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

COMP
COMP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
COMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
COMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSRM vs. COMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and Compass, Inc. (COMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSRMCOMPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

1.18

+3.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

2.43

+9.14

SSRM vs. COMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSRM Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the COMP Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSRM and COMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSRM vs. COMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, roughly equal to the maximum COMP drawdown of -91.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and COMP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSRMCOMPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.68%

-91.29%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.28%

-50.81%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.41%

-57.24%

-16.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.16%

-89.25%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.43%

-53.98%

+24.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.13%

-68.14%

+11.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.24%

24.65%

-12.41%

Volatility

SSRM vs. COMP - Volatility Comparison

SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and Compass, Inc. (COMP) have volatilities of 20.70% and 20.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSRMCOMPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.70%

20.26%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.20%

52.13%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.66%

64.49%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.12%

80.12%

-24.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.11%

79.06%

-25.95%

Dividends

SSRM vs. COMP - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSRM nor COMP has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
COMP
Compass, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%

Financials

SSRM vs. COMP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SSR Mining Inc. and Compass, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
581.78M
2.70B
(SSRM) Total Revenue
(COMP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SSRM vs. COMP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SSR Mining Inc. and Compass, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
SSRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COMP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SSRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.

COMP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported an operating income of -351.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -13.0%.

SSRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.

COMP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a net income of 22.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SSRM and COMP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSRM has higher volatility (20.70%) compared to COMP (20.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSRM dropped -91.68% vs COMP's -91.29%.

SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSRM and COMP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer