SSRM vs. TCEHY
Compare and contrast key facts about SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY).
Performance
SSRM vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSRM vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 34.12% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | 4.41% | 59.31% | 37.54% | -1.46% |
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited | -17.41% | 45.23% | 41.92% | -5.48% | -24.97% | -18.69% | 50.09% | 21.93% | -23.83% | 115.30% |
Fundamentals
SSRM:
$6.38B
TCEHY:
$586.89B
SSRM:
$1.82
TCEHY:
$24.17
SSRM:
16.13
TCEHY:
2.62
SSRM:
0.26
TCEHY:
0.33
SSRM:
3.92
TCEHY:
0.78
SSRM:
1.48
TCEHY:
0.51
SSRM:
$1.63B
TCEHY:
$748.08B
SSRM:
$0.00
TCEHY:
$416.51B
SSRM:
$391.82M
TCEHY:
$308.68B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a 34.12% return, which is significantly higher than TCEHY's -17.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SSRM has outperformed TCEHY with an annualized return of 18.53%, while TCEHY has yielded a comparatively lower 13.31% annualized return.
SSRM
- 1D
- 12.17%
- 1M
- -8.67%
- YTD
- 34.12%
- 6M
- 20.39%
- 1Y
- 193.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
TCEHY
- 1D
- 3.59%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- -17.41%
- 6M
- -25.75%
- 1Y
- -0.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- -3.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSRM vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank
SSRM
TCEHY
SSRM vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSRM | TCEHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.03 | -0.00 | +3.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.13 | 0.23 | +2.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.03 | +0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.51 | -0.06 | +5.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.61 | -0.18 | +16.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSRM | TCEHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | -0.00 | +3.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | -0.08 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.35 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.67 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSRM and TCEHY is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SSRM vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison
SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited | 0.92% | 0.76% | 0.82% | 6.67% | 4.15% | 0.35% | 0.19% | 0.23% | 0.26% | 0.29% | 0.51% | 0.21% |
Drawdowns
SSRM vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, which is greater than TCEHY's maximum drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and TCEHY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSRM | TCEHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.68% | -73.17% | -18.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -30.12% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.16% | -68.59% | -14.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.16% | -73.17% | -9.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.46% | -28.80% | -3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.35% | -19.54% | -37.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.25% | 11.01% | -0.76% |
Volatility
SSRM vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison
SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a higher volatility of 29.23% compared to Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) at 15.10%. This indicates that SSRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSRM | TCEHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.23% | 15.10% | +14.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.65% | 22.50% | +29.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.59% | 31.79% | +32.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 43.24% | +11.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.03% | 38.71% | +14.32% |
Financials
SSRM vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SSR Mining Inc. and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities