PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SSRM vs. T
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SSRMT
YTD Return-48.79%40.79%
1Y Return-52.74%49.91%
3Y Return (Ann)-34.13%12.87%
5Y Return (Ann)-17.26%0.70%
10Y Return (Ann)0.64%4.14%
Sharpe Ratio-0.742.60
Sortino Ratio-0.653.60
Omega Ratio0.881.45
Calmar Ratio-0.591.64
Martin Ratio-1.0715.04
Ulcer Index50.29%3.40%
Daily Std Dev72.80%19.66%
Max Drawdown-91.68%-64.66%
Current Drawdown-87.34%-1.29%

Fundamentals


SSRMT
Market Cap$1.08B$160.08B
EPS-$2.38$1.22
PEG Ratio0.001.93
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.11B$122.06B
Gross Profit (TTM)$35.48M$73.12B
EBITDA (TTM)$244.25M$41.37B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between SSRM and T is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SSRM vs. T - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a -48.79% return, which is significantly lower than T's 40.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SSRM has underperformed T with an annualized return of 0.64%, while T has yielded a comparatively higher 4.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.17%
31.46%
SSRM
T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SSRM vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSRM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SSRM, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.74
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SSRM, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.65
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SSRM, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.88
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SSRM, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SSRM, currently valued at -1.07, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.07
T
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for T, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for T, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for T, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for T, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for T, currently valued at 15.04, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.04

SSRM vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the T Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSRM and T, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.74
2.60
SSRM
T

Dividends

SSRM vs. T - Dividend Comparison

SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.99%6.62%6.66%8.45%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%5.48%5.12%

Drawdowns

SSRM vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and T. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-87.34%
-1.29%
SSRM
T

Volatility

SSRM vs. T - Volatility Comparison

SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a higher volatility of 21.15% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 6.83%. This indicates that SSRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.15%
6.83%
SSRM
T

Financials

SSRM vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SSR Mining Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items