SSRM vs. T
SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. SSRM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, SSRM returned 7.47%/yr vs 1.81%/yr for T. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SSRM vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a 27.24% return, which is significantly higher than T's -10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SSRM has outperformed T with an annualized return of 7.47%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 1.81% annualized return.
SSRM
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 21.84%
- YTD
- 27.24%
- 1Y
- 120.30%
- 3Y*
- 24.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
T
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- -10.13%
- 1Y
- -16.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
SSRM vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 27.24% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | 4.41% | 59.31% | 37.54% | -1.46% |
T AT&T Inc. | -10.13% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSRM and T is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 1996 | 0.07 |
The correlation between SSRM and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SSRM:
$5.79B
T:
$149.84B
SSRM:
$3.26
T:
$3.05
SSRM:
8.55
T:
7.06
SSRM:
0.14
T:
0.29
SSRM:
3.19
T:
1.23
SSRM:
$1.90B
T:
$125.65B
SSRM:
$643.76M
T:
$105.41B
SSRM:
$835.27M
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSRM vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
SSRM
T
SSRM vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSRM | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.90 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | -0.57 | +4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | -1.31 | +10.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSRM vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSRM | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.68% | -64.15% | -27.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.28% | -28.89% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.41% | -28.89% | -44.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.16% | -32.01% | -51.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.16% | -42.35% | -40.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.93% | -24.17% | -11.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.09% | -15.73% | -41.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.87% | 12.52% | +0.35% |
Volatility
SSRM vs. T - Volatility Comparison
SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a higher volatility of 19.02% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 10.00%. This indicates that SSRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSRM | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.02% | 10.00% | +9.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.01% | 19.81% | +36.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.75% | 23.52% | +44.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.34% | 24.36% | +31.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.09% | 23.90% | +29.19% |
Dividends
SSRM vs. T - Dividend Comparison
SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 5.15% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
SSRM vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SSR Mining Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SSRM and T have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSRM has higher volatility (19.02%) compared to T (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSRM dropped -91.68% vs T's -64.15%.
SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSRM and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer