ADM vs. LNG
ADM (Archer-Daniels-Midland Company) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. ADM operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ADM returned 9.38%/yr vs 21.52%/yr for LNG. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ADM vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a 39.84% return, which is significantly higher than LNG's 36.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 9.38%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 21.52% annualized return.
ADM
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 19.44%
- YTD
- 39.84%
- 1Y
- 50.92%
- 3Y*
- 1.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.84%
LNG
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 8.06%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- YTD
- 36.26%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 26.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $327.88M | $285.87M | $300.91M | |
| $449.81M | $470.16M | $533.59M |
ADM vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 39.84% | 18.24% | -27.52% | -20.42% | 39.98% | 37.33% | 12.44% | 17.10% | 5.28% | -9.48% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 36.26% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADM and LNG is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 1997 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ADM and LNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ADM:
$38.20B
LNG:
$55.23B
ADM:
$2.23
LNG:
$6.86
ADM:
35.49
LNG:
38.44
ADM:
0.48
LNG:
2.80
ADM:
1.68
LNG:
14.78
ADM:
$80.61B
LNG:
$20.28B
ADM:
$4.70B
LNG:
$5.52B
ADM:
$3.48B
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADM vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
ADM
LNG
ADM vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADM | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.10 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 0.54 | +3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 1.00 | +8.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADM vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADM | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.01% | -97.84% | +29.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -24.09% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.22% | -24.87% | -24.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.14% | -24.87% | -29.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.14% | -57.53% | +3.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.34% | -11.02% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -43.02% | +21.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | 12.86% | -7.71% |
Volatility
ADM vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is 7.93%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 9.48%. This indicates that ADM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADM | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 9.48% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | 23.32% | -4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 26.45% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.38% | 30.42% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.92% | 32.28% | -5.36% |
Dividends
ADM vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than LNG's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.60% | 3.55% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.82% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ADM vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ADM vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
ADM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 20.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ADM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 408.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
ADM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 298.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ADM and LNG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNG has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to ADM (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADM dropped -68.01% vs LNG's -97.84%.
ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADM and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer