ADM vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ADM or GIS.
Correlation
The correlation between ADM and GIS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ADM vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ADM:
-0.60
GIS:
-0.96
ADM:
-0.67
GIS:
-1.23
ADM:
0.91
GIS:
0.85
ADM:
-0.29
GIS:
-0.57
ADM:
-0.88
GIS:
-1.50
ADM:
17.86%
GIS:
13.66%
ADM:
26.78%
GIS:
21.76%
ADM:
-68.01%
GIS:
-45.08%
ADM:
-44.37%
GIS:
-36.13%
Fundamentals
ADM:
$23.97B
GIS:
$30.03B
ADM:
$2.84
GIS:
$4.55
ADM:
17.57
GIS:
12.05
ADM:
16.43
GIS:
3.55
ADM:
0.29
GIS:
1.53
ADM:
1.05
GIS:
3.22
ADM:
$83.86B
GIS:
$19.64B
ADM:
$5.30B
GIS:
$6.95B
ADM:
$3.48B
GIS:
$3.99B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -13.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of 2.48%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 2.87% annualized return.
ADM
1.46%
10.58%
0.60%
-16.00%
11.28%
2.48%
GIS
-13.92%
-7.25%
-14.57%
-20.88%
0.38%
2.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ADM vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ADM
GIS
ADM vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ADM vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than GIS's 4.46% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 3.97% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% | 1.85% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 4.46% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
ADM vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
ADM vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS) have volatilities of 5.97% and 5.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
ADM vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ADM vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
ADM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 20.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.9%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
ADM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 248.00M and revenue of 20.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
ADM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 295.00M and revenue of 20.18B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.