ADM vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ADM or GIS.
Correlation
The correlation between ADM and GIS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ADM vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ADM:
-0.78
GIS:
0.13
ADM:
-0.81
GIS:
0.31
ADM:
0.85
GIS:
1.04
ADM:
-0.56
GIS:
0.08
ADM:
-1.38
GIS:
0.38
ADM:
18.80%
GIS:
6.44%
ADM:
33.44%
GIS:
18.54%
ADM:
-68.01%
GIS:
-45.08%
ADM:
-45.20%
GIS:
-25.99%
Fundamentals
ADM:
$24.64B
GIS:
$36.60B
ADM:
$3.56
GIS:
$4.20
ADM:
14.46
GIS:
15.70
ADM:
16.43
GIS:
3.34
ADM:
$87.02B
GIS:
$14.66B
ADM:
$5.63B
GIS:
$5.01B
ADM:
$3.72B
GIS:
$3.00B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a -27.57% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's 1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of 2.36%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 5.08% annualized return.
ADM
-27.57%
-4.77%
-16.22%
-26.25%
4.76%
2.36%
GIS
1.19%
-0.30%
-3.45%
2.66%
7.04%
5.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ADM vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ADM vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than GIS's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% | 1.85% | 1.75% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 3.74% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
ADM vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ADM vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 5.22%. This indicates that ADM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ADM vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities