PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ADM vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ADMGIS
YTD Return-7.39%-0.77%
1Y Return-16.21%-12.19%
3Y Return (Ann)6.63%4.82%
5Y Return (Ann)13.34%6.82%
10Y Return (Ann)6.07%5.23%
Sharpe Ratio-0.45-0.70
Daily Std Dev32.98%18.68%
Max Drawdown-68.01%-45.08%
Current Drawdown-29.94%-27.42%

Fundamentals


ADMGIS
Market Cap$31.92B$36.47B
EPS$5.73$4.31
PE Ratio11.2715.16
PEG Ratio16.431.98
Total Revenue (TTM)$66.53B$19.86B
Gross Profit (TTM)$4.68B$6.91B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.12B$3.29B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between ADM and GIS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ADM vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 6.07%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower 5.23% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%8,000.00%9,000.00%10,000.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
5,166.03%
9,240.66%
ADM
GIS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Archer-Daniels-Midland Company

General Mills, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ADM vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ADM, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ADM, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ADM, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.93
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ADM, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ADM, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-0.64
GIS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.91
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-0.93

ADM vs. GIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADM Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ADM and GIS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.20-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.20FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
-0.45
-0.65
ADM
GIS

Dividends

ADM vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than GIS's 3.77% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
2.89%2.49%1.72%2.19%2.86%3.02%3.27%3.19%2.63%3.05%1.85%1.75%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
3.77%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%2.85%

Drawdowns

ADM vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
-29.94%
-27.42%
ADM
GIS

Volatility

ADM vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 5.67%. This indicates that ADM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
6.58%
5.67%
ADM
GIS

Financials

ADM vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items