ADM vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ADM or GIS.
Key characteristics
ADM | GIS | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -12.50% | 10.03% |
1Y Return | -20.61% | -16.73% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 4.51% | 7.46% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.87% | 9.89% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 6.32% | 6.57% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.65 | -0.89 |
Daily Std Dev | 33.29% | 18.26% |
Max Drawdown | -68.01% | -45.08% |
Current Drawdown | -33.80% | -19.52% |
Fundamentals
ADM | GIS | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $32.02B | $39.50B |
EPS | $6.43 | $4.36 |
PE Ratio | 9.77 | 16.05 |
PEG Ratio | 16.43 | 2.06 |
Revenue (TTM) | $93.94B | $20.17B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $7.57B | $6.55B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $4.99B | $4.30B |
Correlation
The correlation between ADM and GIS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ADM vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a -12.50% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's 10.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ADM having a 6.32% annualized return and GIS not far ahead at 6.57%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ADM vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ADM vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than GIS's 3.35% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% | 1.85% | 1.75% |
General Mills, Inc. | 3.35% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
ADM vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ADM vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is 5.71%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that ADM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.